Modeling Students’ Cognitive Load Profiles as a Diagnostic Framework for Adaptive Mathematics Instruction in Higher Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v6i2.4149

Keywords:

cognitive load, cognitive load profile, adaptive learning, mathematics education, higher education

Abstract

This study addresses the growing need for cognitively responsive adaptive learning in higher education mathematics by examining students’ cognitive load profiles as a diagnostic foundation for instructional design. While previous research has primarily treated cognitive load as an outcome variable, limited attention has been given to its configuration at the individual level. This study aims to model students’ cognitive load profiles and explore their implications for adaptive mathematics instruction. A quantitative exploratory design was employed involving 180 undergraduate students selected through probability sampling. Data were collected using a validated Cognitive Load Questionnaire measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. A person-centered profiling approach was applied to identify distinct cognitive load configurations. The results revealed three profiles: overload (34.4%), unproductive load (27.2%), and optimal load (38.4%). High intrinsic and extraneous load combined with moderate germane load indicates suboptimal cognitive resource allocation. This study contributes theoretically by positioning cognitive load profiles as a diagnostic framework for adaptive learning design, and practically by informing cognitively responsive instructional strategies in mathematics education.

References

Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Kirschner, P. (2009). Field dependence–independence and instructional-design effects on learners’ performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1355–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.010

Blegur, I. K. S. (2020). Studi Fenomenologi: Problematika Mahasiswa Asing Belajar Statistika di Perguruan Tinggi. FRAKTAL: JURNAL MATEMATIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA, 1(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.35508/fractal.v1i1.3048

Chen, X., Xie, H., Qin, S. J., Wang, F. L., & Hou, Y. (2025). Artificial Intelligence‐Supported Student Engagement Research: Text Mining and Systematic Analysis. European Journal of Education, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70008

Clark, C., & Kimmons, R. (2023). Cognitive Load Theory. EdTechnica. https://doi.org/10.59668/371.12980

Cosentino, G., Anton, J., Sharma, K., & ... (2025). Generative AI and multimodal data for educational feedback: Insights from embodied math learning. … of Educational …. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13587

Cosentino, G., Anton, J., Sharma, K., Gelsomini, M., Giannakos, M., & Abrahamson, D. (2025). Generative AI and multimodal data for educational feedback: Insights from embodied math learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1686–1709. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13587

Curum, B., & Khedo, K. K. (2021). Cognitive load management in mobile learning systems: principles and theories. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00173-6

Davenport, C. E. (2019). Using Worked Examples to Improve Student Understanding of Atmospheric Dynamics. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100(9), 1653–1664. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0226.1

de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2017). Bridging Cognitive Load and Self-Regulated Learning Research: A complementary approach to contemporary issues in educational research. Learning and Instruction, 51, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.06.001

Ginns, P., Hu, F., & Bobis, J. (2020). Tracing enhances problem‐solving transfer, but without effects on intrinsic or extraneous cognitive load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 1522–1529. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3732

Hawthorne, Benjamin. S., Vella-Brodrick, Dianne. A., & Hattie, J. (2019). Well-Being as a Cognitive Load Reducing Agent: A Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00121

Hery Murtianto, Y., Agus Herlambang, B., & M. (2022). Cognitive Load Theory on Virtual Mathematics Laboratory: Systematic Literature Review. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i19.12461

Jadhav, D., Chettri, S. K., Tripathy, A. K., & Saikia, M. J. (2025). A Technology-Driven Assistive Learning Tool and Framework for Personalized Dyscalculia Interventions. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15(5), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15050085

Jayasree Krishnan, V., Borges Rajguru, S., & Kapila, V. (n.d.). Analyzing Successful Teaching Practices in Middle School Science and Math Classrooms when using Robotics (Fundamental). 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32092

Koomen, M. H. (2016). Practitioner Inquiry with Early Program Teacher Candidates. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(11). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i11.1915

Larmuseau, C., Coucke, H., Kerkhove, P., Desmet, P., & Depaepe, F. (2019). Cognitive Load During Online Complex Problem-Solving in a Teacher Training Context. EDEN Conference Proceedings, (1), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.38069/edenconf-2019-ac-0052

Liu, Q., Tong, S., Liu, C., Zhao, H., Chen, E., Ma, H., & ... (2019). Exploiting cognitive structure for adaptive learning. Proceedings of the 25th …. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330922

Lovell, O., & Sherrington, T. (2020). Sweller’s cognitive load theory in action. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZPSgEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT15&dq=cognitive+load+mathematics+ai+learning+adaptive&ots=l1zM6svd_s&sig=Nu9uW7XDLMpSH5lV5YadglQsCuk

McCormick, M. P., Weissman, A. K., Weiland, C., Hsueh, J., Sachs, J., & Snow, C. (2020). Time well spent: Home learning activities and gains in children’s academic skills in the prekindergarten year. Developmental Psychology, 56(4), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000891

Nurhajarurahmah, S. Z. (2021). Students’ Multiple Intelligence in Visualization of Mathematics Problem Solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1752(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1752/1/012063

Nurhajarurahmah, S. Z., & Mulbar, U. (2025). Mengapa Mahasiswa Masih Keliru Memahami Konsep Pecahan? Suatu Analisis melalui Pendekatan Certainty of Response Index Termodifikasi (CRI-Modif). JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 5(2), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v5i2.1599

Nurhajarurahmah, St. Z., & Syarifuddin, S. (2025). Enhancing Mathematical Cognition through Deep Learning Visualization: A Cognitive and Pedagogical Integration. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 5(4), 2131–2150. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v5i4.2812

Nursit, I. (2015). Pembelajaran Matematika Menggunakan Metode Discovery Berdasarkan Teori Beban Kognitif. JPM : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v1i1.403

Orosco, M. J., Mamedova, S., & Abdulrahim, N. A. (2025). Comprehension strategy instruction for Hispanic children with mathematical learning difficulties. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1645323

Ozogul, G., Johnson, A. M., Moreno, R., & Reisslein, M. (2012). Technological Literacy Learning With Cumulative and Stepwise Integration of Equations Into Electrical Circuit Diagrams. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(4), 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2190072

Pacheco, M. F., Pereira, A. I., & Fernandes, F. (2019). MathE - Improve Mathematical Skills in Higher Education. Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology, 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3318396.3320116

Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2021). Perceived ‘optimal efficiency’: theorization and conceptualization for development and implementation. Heliyon, 7(1), e06042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06042

Putra, A. A., & Nuryadi, N. (2020). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Lms Moodle Ditinjau Dari Cognitive Loads Theory. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.31316/j.derivat.v6i2.498

Richland, L. E., Naslund‐Hadley, E., Alonzo, H., Lyons, E., & Vollman, E. (2020). Teacher and Students’ Mathematics Anxiety and Achievement in a Low‐Income National Context. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12253

Ridho, M. H., & Dasari, D. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Identitas Matematika dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1989

Smith, J. G., & Suzuki, S. (2015). Embedded blended learning within an Algebra classroom: a multimedia capture experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12083

Sofroniou, A. (2025). Advancing conceptual understanding: a meta-analysis on the impact of digital technologies in higher education mathematics. Education Sciences. https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/14282/

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. In COGNITIVE SCIENCE (Vol. 12).

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123876911000028

Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x

Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. C. (2019). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers &Education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519301526

Xu, X., Qiao, L., Cheng, N., Liu, H., & ... (2025). Enhancing self‐regulated learning and learning experience in generative AI environments: The critical role of metacognitive support. Journal of Educational. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13599

Yu, S., & Xue, Q. (2025). Designing for Deep Thinking: A Theory-Driven Inquiry into Problem-Chain Teaching in Primary Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6782865/v1

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21

How to Cite

Nurhajarurahmah, S. Z., & Ja’faruddin, J. (2026). Modeling Students’ Cognitive Load Profiles as a Diagnostic Framework for Adaptive Mathematics Instruction in Higher Education. JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 6(2), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v6i2.4149