Analysis of Presupposition in English Teaching Materials at SMAN 4 Palu

Authors

  • Zulfikri Zulfikri Universitas Islam Negeri Datokarama Palu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v4i2.598

Keywords:

English, Presupposition, Pragmatics

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the types of presuppositions in English teaching materials at SMAN 4 Palu. The method used in this research is discourse analysis of the English textbooks used in the eleventh grade, focusing on identifying examples of existential, factual, and structural presuppositions. Data were collected through critical discourse analysis techniques and interviews. The results of the analysis show that the teaching material at SMAN 4 Palu contains various types of presuppositions that can influence students' understanding. Existential presuppositions, such as "The President of the United States," assume knowledge about a particular entity, whereas factual presuppositions, such as "John stopped smoking," assume the truth of information that students may not know. Structural presuppositions, for example, the use of the word "again" in "He came back again," involve hidden assumptions that require contextual background for proper understanding. Findings show that teaching materials often contain presuppositions that are not relevant to students' local contexts, such as the use of examples from Western culture that students may be unfamiliar with. Therefore, adapting teaching materials to local contexts is very necessary. This research recommends the involvement of Palu regional teachers and education experts in curriculum development and the adaptation of teaching materials to make them more relevant to students' daily lives. By integrating local culture into teaching, students' understanding of texts can increase significantly, enhancing learning effectiveness and supporting the achievement of optimal learning outcomes.

References

Amelia, P., & Hikmawati, A. (2020). Integrating Literary Works as the Local Content of ELT Materials for Undergraduate Students. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v2i3.1250

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson Education.

Brown, & Yule, G. (2002). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2009). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the EFL classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Heinemann.

Hymes, D. (2000). On Communicative Competence. Penguin Books.

Kramsch, C. (2003). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Manurung, P. (2021). Multimedia Interaktif Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Al-Fikru: Jurnal Ilmiah, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.51672/alfikru.v14i1.33

Mariati, P., Purnamasari, N., Soetantyo, S., Suwarna, I. R., & Susanti, E. I. (2021). Prinsip Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi ( Differentiated Instruction ). Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Kemendikbud RI.

Nida, E. A. (2011). Language and culture: Contexts in translating. Routledge.

Nordlund, M., & Norberg, C. (2020). Vocabulary in EFL teaching materials for young learners. International Journal of Language Studies, 14(1), 89–116.

Novawan, A., Alvares Tosalem, S. M. P., Walker, S. A., Ismailia, T., & Budi, A. S. (2022). Reframing Language Education in the Light of Ecological Linguistics Is the Ecological Perspective “Toxic” or “Vitamin”? Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 645(Icoship 2021), 1–10. http://ecolinguistics-association.org/

Roberts, C., & Hite, J. (2014). The impact of local context on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Research, 47(4), 212–220.

Rozie, F. (2018). Persepsi Guru Sekolah Dasar Tentang Penggunaan Media Pempelajaran sebagai Alat Bantu Pencapaian Tujuan Pembelajaran. Widyagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 5(2), 1–12.

Saputra, K. W., Arifin, M. B., & Arianin Setya. (2021). An Analysis of Presupposition on Brand Cohen’s Character in Front of the Class Movie. Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa Seni Dan Budaya, 5(4), 769–777.

Trinaldi, A., Bambang, S. E. M., Afriani, M., Rahma, F. A., & Rustam, R. (2022). Analisis Kebutuhan Penggunaan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Teknologi Infomasi. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(6), 9304–9314. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i6.4037

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Yule, G. (2021). The study of language (8th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Yundayani, A., & Sri Ardiasih, L. (2021). Task-based material design for academic purposes: Learners’ english writing skill improvement. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.18169

Downloads

Published

2024-08-06

How to Cite

Zulfikri, Z. (2024). Analysis of Presupposition in English Teaching Materials at SMAN 4 Palu. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 4(2), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v4i2.598